13 mins read

Apache Spark vs. Hadoop: Processing Big Data at Scale

Top Sources for Software Developers

Find Top IT Companies Ratings

Become a freelance Software Developer

Learn Computer Programming

How is Apache Spark different from Hadoop? Can Apache Spark replace Hadoop in the context of processing big data at scale? How can companies select between Apache Spark and Hadoop for their big data needs?

One of the biggest challenges businesses face today is efficient and scalable processing of big data. IBM highlights that 2.5 quintillion bytes of data are created every day, making it quite a daunting task to process such massive quantities. In addition, a survey by New Vantage Partners indicates that many organizations struggle with managing and leveraging their data. The optimal solution to this problem lies in leveraging robust and efficient data processing frameworks that can process big data at scale. This is where Apache Spark and Hadoop come into play.

In this article, you will learn about the key differences between Apache Spark and Hadoop. We will explore their respective strengths and weaknesses, their applicability in different scenarios of big data processing, and the factors that influence businesses in choosing between these two technologies.

Lastly, we will also delve into case studies where industry giants have harnesses either of these technologies for big data processing, providing an all-encompassing guide and helping you make an informed decision.

Apache Spark vs. Hadoop: Processing Big Data at Scale

Key Definitions: Understanding Apache Spark and Hadoop

Apache Spark is a powerful open source technology used for processing and analyzing big data. It’s popular because it can process vast amounts of data at lightning speed and performs functions including querying, streaming, machine learning, and graph processing.

Hadoop, on the other hand, is another open source technology that is traditionally used for storing and analyzing large amounts of varying data in a distributed computing environment. It is made up of two key parts: the Hadoop Distributed File System for storage, and MapReduce for processing.

These two technologies are often used in conjunction for processing big data at scale, with Spark providing rapid computation and Hadoop offering reliable storage.

Unmasking the Giants: A Deeper Dive into Apache Spark and Hadoop

The Supercharged Capabilities of Apache Spark

Apache Spark is an advanced, open-source data analytics cluster computing framework. Its true power lies in its ability to process vast amounts of data at high speed, making it a critical tool for real-time big data transformation. Unlike Hadoop, Spark processes data in RAM with the help of its Resilient Distributed Datasets (RDDs) feature. This means it significantly reduces the need for read-write operations on a disk, resulting in faster processing speeds- up to 100 times faster in-memory, and 10 times faster on disk. Plus, Spark’s inbuilt caching ability further enhances its performance, allowing intermediate data to be stored in memory and reused across stages, reducing the number of disk reads.

Apache Spark not only excels at handling large-scale data processing tasks but is also highly versatile. It supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, and Scala, and carries out complex analytics like machine learning, graph algorithms, and stream processing.

Hadoop: The Foundation for Big Data Processing

On the other hand, Hadoop, another open-source framework, is designed to store, process and analyze large sets of unstructured data. Its primary components are the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) and MapReduce. HDFS is responsible for storing data across distributed systems, offering high fault tolerance, while MapReduce is the processing subset, offering a reliable method for processing chunks of data. Hadoop’s ecosystem is widespread, with components facilitating data ingestion, ETL operations, data warehousing, and even machine learning. Despite its advantages, Hadoop’s MapReduce can be slower compared to Apache Spark’s processing speed due to its reliance on disk storage.

Even though the two frameworks have different approaches to data processing, they complement each other in certain cases. It’s critical for organizations to determine the right framework based on their requirements.

  • Apache Spark excels in processing real-time data and offers quicker outcomes, whereas Hadoop is ideal for projects where data processing time isn’t the crucial factor.
  • While Spark’s resource demand is higher due to its in-memory processing, Hadoop’s operation cost is lower.
  • For projects involving machine learning algorithms, Spark is more suitable due to its advanced libraries. Hadoop, on the other hand, is perfect for linear scalability with data volume.

It’s important to note that the choice between Apache Spark and Hadoop doesn’t have to be an either-or situation. In many cases, Spark can run on top of Hadoop, leveraging HDFS for data storage while carrying out processing with its own engine. This combination offers a potent big data solution, harnessing the strengths of both frameworks.

Battle of the Titans: Comparing Efficacy of Apache Spark and Hadoop in handling Big Data

Spark or Hadoop?

Is there truly an ultimate, unbeatable solution when it comes to processing Big Data? The reality is that both Apache Spark and Hadoop have their merits and demerits. Spark is regarded as a powerful tool for in-memory data processing and real-time analytics, while Hadoop is widely accepted as a high-capacity storage infrastructure that can process large-scale data. Although Spark does have a faster data processing ability, it may not be the best choice for projects with budget constraints due to its extensive memory requirements.

The Challenge of Choice

The primary issue here is deciding which framework is suitable for specific projects. On one hand, Apache Spark allows developers to build big data applications with unprecedented speed due to its advanced analytics like Streaming, and SQL and Machine Learning. This speed, however, comes at the memory cost. On the other hand, Hadoop, with its MapReduce algorithm, can handle enormous amounts of data but its speed is relatively slower. It’s also worth mentioning that Hadoop is better known for its ability to store huge amounts of diverse data. The choice to be made indeed poses a daunting challenge for enterprises and developers alike.

Adopting the Best Approach

Many successful projects have demonstrated a smart use of both Apache Spark and Hadoop. For instance, Netflix has combined Spark Streaming with Hadoop’s MapReduce to process over a trillion events every day with extreme efficiency. Then there is Alibaba, which has successfully scaled Yarn clusters to support Spark at an unprecedented scale of ten thousand nodes. Another approach is adopted by IBM and Twitter, both of which use Apache Spark for machine learning tasks to improve user experiences. These cases clearly demonstrate that the best solution lies in understanding one’s distinct project requirements and capitalizing on the strengths of both Spark and Hadoop.

Transforming the Landscape: How Apache Spark and Hadoop Redefine Big Data Processing

A Critical Viewpoint: The Competition Begins

What are the core differentiators when looking at Apache Spark and Hadoop – the two titans of big data processing? Well, Apache Spark operates on the principle of advanced analytics. It offers support for various tasks such as SQL queries, diverse data analysis and processing, machine learning, and graph processing. Its highlight is its lightning-fast processing speed which holds it in good stead when it comes to handling large scale data. It achieves this feat by breaking down data processing tasks into smaller batches, resulting in reduced data handling times. On the contrary, Hadoop, coded in Java language, functions basically as a distributed storage system and operates on MapReduce processing model. Although Hadoop is adept at breaking down large data sets into smaller parts, its overall processing speed is slower than that of Spark.

Unpacking the Deeper Concerns: The Nitty-Gritties

However, the debate does not merely end at their basic functionalities. A major challenge that emerges with Spark’s operations is its in-memory storage capacity. Despite offering unparalleled speed, it requires a substantial amount of memory to run at its full capacity, often making it expensive for businesses with budget constraints. On the other side, Hadoop, with its slower processing speed, offers a cost effective solution due to its potential in handling large data sets with distributed storage. But it is often critiqued for its latency issues and its dependency on high-quality hardware for efficient functioning.

Real-world Implications: Making the Choice

As we delve into the specifics of data processing, our evaluation can be enriched with actual use-cases. For instance, The New York Times used Hadoop to convert around 4 terabytes of data into PDF format in a mere 36 hours with the help of Amazon’s EC2 cloud solution, demonstrating Hadoop’s prowess in dealing with large data sets. On the other hand, giant video platform Netflix has leveraged Spark’s capabilities effectively. Their real-time data pipeline, known as Keystone, uses Spark Streaming for processing around 8 billion events daily, showcasing the strength of Spark’s speed and real-time analytics.


Isn’t it miraculous how technology continues to harness immeasurable amounts of data around us, while also orchestrating effective strategies to control, process, and benefit from it? Apache Spark and Hadoop, two pivotal Big Data technologies, empower enterprises to execute data processing tasks more efficiently. Through a comprehensive comparison, it appears that both technologies specialize in their realms and can be leveraged in their unique ways. Spark, with its lightning-fast processing speed, is perfect for data analytics requiring real-time processing. In contrast, Hadoop, with its robust processing power and economic storage, is ideal for computations involving colossal data sets that don’t pose strict time limitations.

We cordially invite you to follow our blog to join us in the journey through the ever-evolving landscape of technology. We will help you stay updated about the latest trends, advancements, and debates in the tech world. Our blog aims to provide in-depth analyses, comprehensive tutorials, and thought-provoking discussions on a wide array of topics such as Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and much more. So, tap the ‘Follow’ button and let’s embark on this knowledge-infused expedition together.

In anticipation, we are thrilled to hint about future releases containing more exciting topics that would undoubtedly ignite your intellectual curiosity. Whether you’re a developer, an analyst, a tech enthusiast, or simply a curious mind craving to learn about the dynamic world of technology, we promise there is something special in store for you. So, wait in the wings as we prepare to unravel, explain, and discuss the technology that is shaping our world today and will continue to do so in the future. Stay tuned!


1. What are the core functions of Apache Spark and Hadoop?
Apache Spark and Hadoop are both open-source frameworks that process big data, though they serve different purposes. Hadoop is better suited for batch processing of large data sets, whereas Spark is designed for real-time data processing and iterative algorithms.

2. What advantages does Apache Spark have over Hadoop?
Apache Spark outperforms Hadoop in speed, offering processing speeds up to 100 times faster for in-memory computing and 10 times faster for disk computing. Spark also provides a unified analytics engine for big data, simplifying use and improving efficiency.

3. How does Hadoop match up against Apache Spark in terms of cost-effectiveness?
Hadoop can be more cost-effective than Apache Spark when it comes to storing massive amounts of data because it uses inexpensive, commodity hardware. Nevertheless, the computing power required by Spark may affect its cost-effectiveness on its behalf.

4. Can the two platforms, Apache Spark and Hadoop, coexist in tandem?
Yes, Apache Spark and Hadoop MapReduce are synergistic technologies that can coexist well. Spark can run on top of Hadoop’s YARN (Yet Another Resource Negotiator) cluster manager, hence benefitting from Hadoop’s powerful data handling capabilities.

5. Which one amongst Apache Spark and Hadoop, is better for real-time data processing?
Apache Spark wins over Hadoop in terms of real-time data processing. Spark uses in-memory processing, which is faster and more appropriate for real-time analytics than Hadoop, which typically relies on slower disk-based storage.